Razer USA : Fri 06:03 Blueprints : Fri 15:03 Razer Asia : Fri 22:03
Friday, 09 January 2009
News
GC 08 Special
About us
Forum
Tutorials
Reports
Gallery
Downloads
Shirt Shop
Mediadata
Contact
Forum Login






register | lost password?
enter/resend activation code
Partner site
Place your bets and start winning big! Only at Pacific Poker are you able to increase your winnings by playing at ring games and tournaments simultaneous- ly! Join the best online poker room and enjoy the texas holdem poker gaming world.
Partner Site
Have you played at any one of the online poker rooms?
If you have not done so yet, then check out our list of the best poker and backgammon sites on the Internet with complete ratings.


Handy PHP
Free PHP Help!
 
 
 
  Razer Destructor or Qpad CT for Deathadder
Home Help Search

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Razer Destructor or Qpad CT for Deathadder  (Read 1441 times)
HyBreed
*

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 146



« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2008, 03:21:09 pm »

cool, let us know how it turns out  Grin
Logged

Razer DeathAdder, eXactMat, Lycosa, Piranha, Goliathus Omega Control, Diamondback 3G Earth Green
zweetkever
*

Karma: 2
Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 8


« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2008, 06:09:09 pm »

I am very eager for the results, keep us posted, in this thread or in a new 1, thnx!
Logged
ZX679
*

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Canada Canada

Posts: 236



« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2008, 06:20:36 pm »

My Destructor is arriving on Friday. I will also voice my opinions about it's performance with the Lachesis and DeathAdder.
Logged

Lachesis - DeathAdder - Tarantula - eXactMat - Mantis Speed - Destructor - Barracuda AC-1 & HP-1

Phenom X4 9850 BE, ASUS M3A32-MVP, 4GB OCZ XTC DDR2-1066, Radeon HD 4870 512MB,  500GB Barracuda,  Antec Truepower Quattro 850W, Samsung 2053BW LCD, TJ09-B
PimpUigi
*

Karma: 4
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 429


PimpUigi!!


« Reply #18 on: October 08, 2008, 01:13:54 am »

Be sure to tell us specific and exact lift off distances ; )
Logged
Hopkins
Moderator
*

Karma: 11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1106



« Reply #19 on: October 08, 2008, 11:27:06 am »

Aargh, I feel pressure to do it now!  But that's good, keep asking me Wink  I will try to do it tonight.  Damn, now I've set a date...
Logged
Hopkins
Moderator
*

Karma: 11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1106



« Reply #20 on: October 08, 2008, 11:17:11 pm »

Okay, I've bunged the Destructor lift-off distances on another thread:

http://razerblueprints.ne...c,8016.msg65716/#msg65716
Logged
Hopkins
Moderator
*

Karma: 11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1106



« Reply #21 on: October 08, 2008, 11:47:15 pm »

It was interesting to go back to my old mice.  I've decided to stop using the Lachesis at home for a while and go back to the Copperhead seeing as I have been going on about it so much!  I'll let you know whether I have rose-tinted memories or if I still like it.  The sensor does feel more stable than the Lachesis, as if it is having to deal with less jitter.  Then again, perhaps it's unfair comparing the Lachesis on nearly 4000dpi with the Copperhead's native resolution of 2000dpi.  Or, perhaps not.  Anyway, I will come back with a conclusion at some point.

The Copperhead's side buttons are still a pain in the arse to reach.  In fact, I think that the Lachesis has the most usable selection of other buttons on any mouse that I have tried.  I liked the placement of the Boomslang buttons on the original mice, but on the new version of the Boomslang they are too easy to press and the mouse is heavier, meaning accidental presses when you lift the mouse are frequent.  Plus, the Boomslang has just 5 buttons whereas the Lachesis has 9 (!).

The Lachesis' shape has definitely grown on me; I really like it.  Let's see how I find it after some time with the Copperhead.  The Copperhead's rails are definitely odd.  They make the mouse feel very wide.  I still rather like them though.  The Diamondback feels much better suited for fingertip/claw grip than the Copperhead because it is narrower, shorter and lower.  I think that the Diamondback feels more conventional.

The Death Adder I cannot comment on too much, being a left-hander, however it does feel lovely in my right hand.  I can quite easily understand why people have raved about it having the best side buttons that they have ever used.  The feel as if they are in just the right place for my thumb and have a wonderful tactile response.

All of these mice have excellent wheels, but I think that the Lachesis' wheel is marginally better than the others.  I'm not sure what the DB 3G will be like, but I suspect it will be like the Lachesis.  The DA seems to have a slightly larger wheel than the others.

The DA on the Destructor confused me a bit.  I initially suffered from the same annoying tracking that I get with my BS:CE on a func 1030 pad - an issue where it won't accurately track "per-pixel", a bit like the "jitter correction" in the original Diamondbacks (for those who remember this!).  I was about to rant about it when I retested - twice - and it had apparently "healed" Tongue  And I've just checked again and it's fine.  I'll be bringing the BS:CE home from my workplace to test with the Destructor.  I hope it works because I'm really keen to try the Salmosa - another mouse with the same sensor, apparently.

Anyway, I hope that these insights are at least interesting to others.  I still love seeing peoples reactions when I tell them that I post on a "mouse forum" Tongue.
Logged
ZX679
*

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Canada Canada

Posts: 236



« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2008, 04:09:57 am »

Well I've played with the Destructor for a bit. At first I hated it. I've been using the mantis for some months and it's taken me a while to get used to low sensitivity. It seems to me that the Destructor + Lachesis combination works much better at higher sensitivity because of the mat's low friction. Amazingly after only 2 hours of Unreal Tournament 3 I became re-accustomed to medium sensitivity (650 DPI) and the headshots just came. It's a joy to use and there are no perceptible tracking issues. I haven't measured the lift-off distance but it didn't feel any higher than it was on the mantis.

I only used the DeathAdder on the Destructor for a short time but I didn't enjoy it because I have one of those DAs with very thin teflon feet and it felt as if the mouse's belly was scraping against the pad. I will let you guys no more as I use the new pad more but so far so good.
Logged

Lachesis - DeathAdder - Tarantula - eXactMat - Mantis Speed - Destructor - Barracuda AC-1 & HP-1

Phenom X4 9850 BE, ASUS M3A32-MVP, 4GB OCZ XTC DDR2-1066, Radeon HD 4870 512MB,  500GB Barracuda,  Antec Truepower Quattro 850W, Samsung 2053BW LCD, TJ09-B
PimpUigi
*

Karma: 4
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 429


PimpUigi!!


« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2008, 06:27:28 pm »

Mantis has notoriously high lift off distances.
So if you can adjust to Mantis' then you can adjust to lower ones for sure.

lol : )
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Razer Blueprints  >  English  >  Razer Mouses  >  DeathAdder Mouse  >  Topic: Razer Destructor or Qpad CT for Deathadder
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 21 queries.
 
   

© Razer Blueprints - the razer community

© 2009 Razer Blueprints - the razer community
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.